In one of the
trainings I attended recently, there was an emphasis on giving feedback. When
you give feedback about what the other person should improve on, it would feel
like a performance review; instead, if you describe what impact they had on
you, both positive and negative then they will consider it in right sense was
the argument made. Interesting I thought! I am really not convinced that this
approach will work for all and work in all situations. What is more interesting
is that I got this one-size fit all gyan from a training that preaches on the
need to consider individuals more than practices
There are people who
would like to look at the system rather than personal feedback; impact on you
as an individual will not matter to them; it may even hurt their ego. There are
a few others who get put off when you position your interests in front - they
will also want a systemic view of the feedback or a feedback from their
perspective. There are a few others who will not consider any type of feedback.
But as a coach, you may want them to understand the impact and make them change
their behavior; in such a situation, letting them fail and amplifying the pain
could work better than giving the feedback.
More than all this,
the person who gives the feedback should consider if their view is really
correct, the feedback is needed for improving the situation. I am only thinking
of Socrates who talked about three sieves to be used before spreading gossips.
I think the sieves fit the feedback techniques too though they are not same as
gossip!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment